Is this allowed to be uploaded here?

After personally witnessing and documenting the plan Golitsyn struggled to convey since 1990 I am a true believer in both his books. I am an experienced investigative journalist, intelligence analyst starting in 1969 with a CBS affiliate at the height of the Vietnam War.

After being deployed undercover by the FBI and BATF during the VANPAC mail-bombing case in 1990 I came to the conclusion the KGB was responsible for the mail-bomb attacks against the United States 11th Circuit Appeals Court and other courts.

The KGB plan included taking America from the top-down, an easy approach to subdue Americans, utilizing obedience to the law without gun-violence and insurrection in the streets.

I have been able to document and align most of the current and past events in America the book faintly points to as a how-to-guide in reference to the collapse of Soviet states.

I have been able to identify key infiltrators by the KGB in Florida and Alabama and modification of the evolving plan as the Chinese PLA (People's Liberation Army) placed themselves in the final stage by the adoption of "Unrestricted Warfare" during 1999.

The book's most important and unexplored region involves the Kleptocratic break of Soviet Sattelite states by the embezzlement of those states treasuries. This is an event we are are witnessing real-time in America. Perestroika Deception is Hard reading but worth every page.

Throughout KGB defector Major Anatoliy Golitsyn’s second book 'The Perestroika Deception' (1995) the author decries the West’s blind acceptance of the political and economic changes that occurred within the Soviet Bloc, culminating in the collapse of the East Bloc and later the collapse of the USSR. In a typical passage denoting exasperation that can be found throughout the book, Golitsyn writes:

"Western acceptance of the changes in the USSR and Eastern Europe as a trend towards genuine democracy which serves Western interests and therefore merits Western support show how little the West comprehends the essence of the changes and the dangers they entail. In part this non-comprehension arises from confusion over terminology. What the West calls ‘democratisation’, Soviet strategists call the transformation of the ‘dictatorship of the proletariat’ into the ‘state of the whole people’."

Western governments, of course, are well aware that the collapse of the USSR (and East Bloc) is a strategic ruse, its purpose to lull the West into complacency, and the West keeps its silence concerning the ruse, enabling the ruse, because the political parties and institutions of the West were long co-opted by Marxists, including co-option of Western intelligence agencies such as the CIA. Golitsyn wouldn’t have been aware that the political parties of the West were already long co-opted by Marxists when he wrote his first book, New Lies for Old (1984), and had no reason to suspect Marxist co-option of the West even during the process of collapse within the USSR. After the collapse, however, is a different story. Because the USSR altered its strategy (no doubt after the publication of New Lies for Old) and instead of utilizing a 'liberalization' ruse it instead opted for a 'liberalization resulting in a collapse' ruse, a 'liberalization resulting in a collapse' ruse would have clued Golitsyn to the Marxist pedigree of the West, globe even, by the time he was preparing The Perestroika Deception for publication.

We clearly discern the fraudulent collapse of the USSR by (1) the continued existence of thousands of statues to the anathema Lenin standing proudly throughout Russia; (2) the continued existence of anathema Soviet iconography; and (3) post USSR electorates electing back into power Soviet era Communist Party member Quislings. With a liberalization' ruse there would be no problems with the continued existence of such Soviet themed artifacts and electing into power Communist Party members, but with a 'liberalization resulting in a collapse' ruse those Soviet artifacts and elections are tell tale signs proving that the collapse of the USSR is a strategic ruse. Under Golitsyn's original understanding, as presented in New Lies for Old, the USSR was to only 'liberalize', after which the continued existence of Soviet themed artifacts and the election of Communist Party members would be normal. Not normal, however, if the USSR had collapsed. Indeed, the fact that not one political party in the West voiced a need to verify the collapse of the USSR would have also alerted Golitsyn that the political parties of the West were co-opted by Marxists, since the survival of the West depends on verification.

In The Perestroika Deception Golitsyn doesn't discuss what he knows concerning the Marxist co-option of the West (the book is a mere collection of memorandum the author submitted to the CIA between 1973 and October 1995), which is where this researcher fills in the gaps. The following succinct proof proves the Marxist co-option of the West...

The West never verified the collapse of the USSR because no collapse occurred, since if a real collapse had occurred the West would have verified it, since the survival of the West depends on verification. Conversely, this proves that the political parties of the West were co-opted by Marxists long before the fraudulent collapse of the USSR, since the survival of the West depends on verification.

In fact, the 'freed' Soviets and West also never (1) de-Communized the Soviet Armed Forces of its Communist Party officer corps, which was 90% officered by Communist Party members; and (2) arrested/de-mobilized the 5-6 million vigilantes that assisted the Soviet Union's Ministry of the Interior and police control the populations of the larger cities during the period of Perestroika (1986-1991).

Due to New Lies for Old, the USSR was (1) forced to alter its strategy; which (2a) allows one to empirically verify the fraudulent collapse of the USSR; thereby (2b) also allowing one to empirically verify the Marxist infiltration of the West's political parties and institutions.

Two discoveries I made in April 2015:

(I) Communist control of Yugoslavia ‘civil wars’ gone unnoticed.

Secessionist Yugoslav Orthodox, Catholic and Muslim factions waged dirty wars against each other, neglecting to first wipe out the 9% of the population that attempted to do away with religion in Yugoslavia, proving the wars were orchestrated and controlled by the communist faction.

Murder, torture and legal discrimination of those professing religious sentiment was so intense under the Marxist regime in Belgrade, that those who professed no religious affiliation increased from less than 10% pre-1945 to a bewildering 32% by 1987...

"Like in most former Communist countries in Central, Eastern and South­‑Eastern Europe, the means and actions applied by the Yugoslav Government between 1945 and 1990 to reduce the influence of religions and religious organisations were quite effective: While there was just a tiny group of people who regarded themselves to be without a religion before the Second World War (less than 0.1% of the population), this number grew to 13% in 1953 and to 32% in 1987."

That 9% constitutes members of the League of Communists of Yugoslavia, the Marxist party that subjugated Yugoslavia from 1945 until the party's dissolution in January 1990. Before any religious sectarian strife, first there would have been massive reprisals against the reviled Communists who implemented policies to wipe out religion in Yugoslavia. The fact that no such reprisals took place proves that the breakup of Yugoslavia, during the Yugoslav Wars (1991-2001), was manufactured and controlled by the Communists; and

(II) When Soviet citizens were liberated from up to 74 years of horrific Marxist-atheist oppression on December 26, 1991, the day the USSR officially ended, there were ZERO celebrations throughout the USSR, proving (1) the ‘collapse’ of the USSR is a strategic ruse; and (2) the political parties of the West were already co-opted by Marxists, otherwise the USSR (and East Bloc nations) couldn't have gotten away with the ruse.

ZERO celebrations, as the The Atlantic article inadvertently informs us...

Google: The Atlantic magazine 20 Years Since The Fall of the Soviet Union

Notice, however, the Kremlin staged anti-government demonstrations that took place in Russia (and other Soviet republics) in the years immediately preceding the 'collapse', yet ZERO celebrations after the 'collapse'!

The above means that the so-called ‘War on Terror’ is an operation being carried out by the Marxist co-opted governments of the West in alliance with the USSR and other Communist nations, the purpose being to (1) destroy the prominence of the West in the eyes of the world, where the West is seen (i) invading nations without cause; (ii) causing chaos around the globe; and (iii) killing over one-million civilians and boasting of torture; (2) close off non-Russian supplies of oil for export, thereby increasing the price of oil, the higher price allowing oil exporting Russia to maintain economic stability while she modernizes and increases her military forces; (3) destroy the United States Armed Forces via the never-ending ‘War on Terror’; the ultimate purpose of the aforementioned to (4) bring about the demise of the United States in the world, opening up a political void to be filled by a new pan-national entity composed of Europe and Russia (replacing the European Union), a union ‘From the Atlantic to Vladivostok’; which will (5) see the end of NATO.

The West never verified the collapse of the USSR because no collapse occurred, since if a real collapse had occurred the West would have verified it, since the survival of the West depends on verification. Conversely, this proves that the political parties of the West were co-opted by Marxists long before the fraudulent collapse of the USSR, since the survival of the West depends on verification.

Conclusion:

The West will form new political parties where candidates are vetted for Marxist ideology, the use of the polygraph to be an important tool for such vetting. Then the West can finally liberate the globe of vanguard Communism.